Would small business owners in Ohio pay $50 a month for an AI bookkeeping assistant?
Summary
32% of self-employed adults in Ohio said they probably would not pay $50 per month for an AI bookkeeping assistant, against 30% who said they probably would pay. The intervals overlap, so the sample cannot put those two answers in order.
- 1Widest gap · employment: 18 pts — employed adults are higher than adults not in the labor force on probably would not pay, and the gap is clear.
- 2The lead: 2 pts — the two leading answers are inside the margin, so the sample cannot rank them.
- 3How it settled: 3 pts — the leading estimate moved less than its own margin over the last 281 profiles, so the sample had settled.
These are synthetic profiles rather than real people; on 46 multiple-choice questions checked against the 2024 General Social Survey, simulated answers sat a median 24 points from real people’s within demographic groups and 16 points nationally.
What people answered
The share choosing each option. The dot is the estimate; the band is the 95% interval.
How the estimate settled
Each answer's share after every ten profiles; the band is the 95% interval of the leading answer, and it narrows as more people are asked.
Who was asked
The make-up of the sample, drawn to match the population asked.
Why they answered this way
People who would pay see the assistant as a way to save time, catch mistakes, and avoid doing bookkeeping themselves. Those who would not pay focus on the recurring cost, tight budgets, and not seeing enough value from another subscription.
Fifty dollars every month feels like too much for something I might only use now and then.
I’d rather keep doing the books myself than add another subscription to our household bills.
My business is small, and I don't see enough work being saved to make the fee worthwhile.
Paying for it would make sense if it keeps me from spending evenings sorting receipts and fixing entries.
I use online tools for most things already, so I’d pay if it takes bookkeeping off my plate.
The monthly cost is reasonable if it catches mistakes and saves me time I can use on customers.
Not in my budget.
My household runs on a very tight budget, so a bookkeeping app isn't something I can justify.
No personal income means I can't take on another monthly charge, especially for a business tool.
Who answered what
Share answering “Probably would not pay”, by the attributes of the people asked, against everyone (the vertical line). Groups with few profiles have wide intervals.
Biggest gaps
On each attribute, the group that answered lowest and the one that answered highest, and the gap between them. Groups of at least ten profiles.
- Employment18 ptsnot in the labor force 18%employed 36%
- Age27 pts · within the margin20-24 17%70-74 44%
- Education17 pts · within the margingraduate degree 22%high school diploma 39%
- Sex2 pts · within the marginwomen 31%men 33%
Sex
Employment
Education
Age
Every breakdown
Full reportThe answer by all ninety attributes, ranked by how much they separate people, with an interval on each.
Ask us to run it →State by state
Full reportThe answer in every state, mapped, with the sample behind each.
Ask us to run it →In the full report
This page is the free preview: the answer, why, and four breakdowns. A full run adds the rest. See what the report holds on this sample, or read a finished report.
The kinds of people in this answer
Full reportFour or five groups of reasons, each with its share and its number: who anchors on today’s bill, who shares a login, who pays for the kids.
Ask us to run it →Every reason, exportable
Full reportAll the people asked, in their own words, with their attributes, as a table to filter and download.
Ask us to run it →The whole population
Full reportThousands of profiles instead of a hundred: intervals a fifth as wide, and rare groups large enough to read.
Ask us to run it →The next questions
Full reportWould you take ads for five dollars less? Which service would you drop first? Asked of the same people.
Ask us to run it →A one-page summary
Full reportThis page says the finding in short; the report lays it out with the chart, the segments and the caveats as one page to print or forward.
Ask us to run it →How this was computed
Options: Definitely would pay · Probably would pay · Probably would not pay · Definitely would not pay · Not sureSample571 profiles drawn in a fixed representative order from the population; asking more extends the same sample rather than starting overMethodEach profile answers in character from its own attributes. Answers outside the format are discarded before counting.AccuracyThe interval reflects sampling variation in the simulated sample. On 46 multiple-choice questions checked against the 2024 General Social Survey, simulated answers from this population sat a median 24 points from real people's within demographic groups and 16 points nationally. Every checkAssumptionsThe available population attributes do not distinguish small businesses from other businesses; business_owner=true is used as the closest available filter.
Run it on the whole population
A full run asks every relevant profile, breaks the answer down by any attribute, and takes your own segments. Tell us what you want to run; we reply within a day.
Get in touch