census.world

Would adults in Colorado take a job that paid less but had more flexible hours?

?
Adults in Colorado, 4,751,000 people · 1,000 profiles askedFirst 100 free · Need more?
51%said Yes
0%95% interval 48% to 54%100%

Summary

51% of adults in Colorado said Yes to taking a lower-paid job with more flexible hours, against 36% who said No.

  1. 1The lead: 16 pts yes is ahead of no, and the order is clear at this sample size.
  2. 2Widest gap · sex: 23 pts women were more likely than men to say yes, and the gap is clear.
  3. 3The rest of the answers: 13% were not sure, leaving a smaller group whose choice may depend on how much pay they would give up.
  4. 4How it settled: 1 pt the yes estimate moved less than its own margin over the last 500 profiles, so the sample had settled.

These are synthetic profiles rather than real people, and on 11 yes-or-no questions checked against the 2024 General Social Survey, simulated answers from this population sat a median 17 points from real people's within demographic groups and 8 points nationally.

The split

How the answers divide. The bracket under the bar is the 95% interval of the leading answer.

Yes51% · 48%54%
Not sure13% · 11%15%
No36% · 33%39%

How the estimate settled

Each answer's share after every ten profiles; the band is the 95% interval of the leading answer, and it narrows as more people are asked.

10 profiles: 60% (31% to 83%)20 profiles: 45% (26% to 66%)30 profiles: 53% (36% to 70%)40 profiles: 50% (35% to 65%)50 profiles: 50% (37% to 63%)60 profiles: 50% (38% to 62%)70 profiles: 51% (40% to 63%)80 profiles: 50% (39% to 61%)90 profiles: 49% (39% to 59%)100 profiles: 51% (41% to 61%)110 profiles: 52% (43% to 61%)120 profiles: 50% (41% to 59%)130 profiles: 49% (41% to 58%)140 profiles: 50% (42% to 58%)150 profiles: 50% (42% to 58%)160 profiles: 51% (44% to 59%)170 profiles: 51% (43% to 58%)180 profiles: 51% (44% to 58%)190 profiles: 51% (44% to 58%)200 profiles: 52% (45% to 58%)210 profiles: 51% (44% to 58%)220 profiles: 51% (44% to 57%)230 profiles: 51% (44% to 57%)240 profiles: 52% (45% to 58%)250 profiles: 51% (45% to 57%)260 profiles: 51% (45% to 57%)270 profiles: 51% (45% to 57%)280 profiles: 50% (45% to 56%)290 profiles: 51% (45% to 57%)300 profiles: 51% (45% to 57%)310 profiles: 51% (45% to 56%)320 profiles: 52% (46% to 57%)330 profiles: 51% (46% to 57%)340 profiles: 51% (46% to 57%)350 profiles: 51% (46% to 56%)360 profiles: 51% (45% to 56%)370 profiles: 50% (45% to 55%)380 profiles: 50% (45% to 55%)390 profiles: 50% (45% to 55%)400 profiles: 51% (46% to 55%)410 profiles: 51% (46% to 56%)420 profiles: 51% (46% to 55%)430 profiles: 50% (46% to 55%)440 profiles: 50% (46% to 55%)450 profiles: 51% (46% to 55%)460 profiles: 50% (46% to 55%)470 profiles: 50% (46% to 55%)480 profiles: 50% (46% to 55%)490 profiles: 50% (46% to 55%)500 profiles: 51% (46% to 55%)510 profiles: 50% (46% to 55%)520 profiles: 50% (46% to 55%)530 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)540 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)550 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)560 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)570 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)580 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)590 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)600 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)610 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)620 profiles: 52% (48% to 56%)630 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)640 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)650 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)660 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)670 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)680 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)690 profiles: 51% (47% to 54%)700 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)710 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)720 profiles: 51% (47% to 54%)730 profiles: 51% (47% to 54%)740 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)750 profiles: 51% (47% to 55%)760 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)770 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)780 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)790 profiles: 51% (47% to 54%)800 profiles: 51% (47% to 54%)810 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)820 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)830 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)840 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)850 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)860 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)870 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)880 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)890 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)900 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)910 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)920 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)930 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)940 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)950 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)960 profiles: 51% (48% to 55%)970 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)980 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)990 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)1000 profiles: 51% (48% to 54%)
0%50%100%250500750100051%
Yes51%
No36%
Not sure13%
95% interval of “Yes

Who was asked

The make-up of the sample, drawn to match the population asked.

Sex1000 profiles
men 51%women 49%
Employment1000 profiles
employed 66%not in the labor force 31%unemployed 2%armed forces 1%
Education1000 profiles
bachelor's degree 28%some college 20%high school diploma 20%graduate degree 15%associate degree 9%other 8%
Age921 profiles
30-34 11%35-39 10%25-29 10%40-44 10%20-24 10%other 49%

Why they answered this way

The yes answers focus on having more time, handling family responsibilities, and reducing the pressure of rigid schedules. The no and unsure answers focus on protecting pay, stability, benefits, or retirement, with flexibility only worth it if the financial tradeoff were small.

More control over my schedule would make everyday life less rushed, even if the paycheck dropped some.
Woman, 36, ColoradoYes
Family responsibilities would be easier to handle if I wasn't tied to fixed work hours.
Woman, 22, Colorado · not workingYes
More time at home would be worth giving up some pay.
Woman, 48, ColoradoYes
With my current workload, flexible hours would help me manage work without everything spilling into the evening.
Woman, 46, ColoradoYes
More time at home.
Woman, 21, Colorado · not workingYes
The paycheck still matters, and I wouldn't give up stable earnings just for a looser schedule.
Man, 33, ColoradoNo
I wouldn't trade the stability and benefits of my current job for more flexible hours.
Man, 42, ColoradoNo
I'm retired, so taking another job would only make sense if the pay cut were very small.
Woman, 69, Colorado · not workingNo
It depends on how much less it paid and whether the hours were actually useful.
Man, 68, Colorado · not workingNot sure

Who answered what

Share answering “Yes”, by the attributes of the people asked, against everyone (the vertical line). Groups with few profiles have wide intervals.

Biggest gaps

On each attribute, the group that answered lowest and the one that answered highest, and the gap between them. Groups of at least ten profiles.

  1. Age83 pts
    70-74 14%15-19 96%
  2. Employment56 pts
    armed forces 20%unemployed 76%
  3. Education35 pts
    less than 9th grade 37%some high school 72%
  4. Sex23 pts
    men 40%women 63%

Sex

0%25%50%75%100%
men
40% 36%44%
women
63% 59%67%
estimate 95% interval everyone

Employment

0%25%50%75%100%
employed
59% 55%62%
not in the labor force
35% 30%40%
unemployed
76% 55%89%
armed forces
20% 6%51%
estimate 95% interval everyone

Education

0%25%50%75%100%
bachelor's degree
56% 51%62%
some college
53% 46%60%
high school diploma
48% 42%55%
graduate degree
41% 34%49%
associate degree
49% 39%59%
some high school
72% 58%83%
less than 9th grade
37% 23%54%
estimate 95% interval everyone

Age

0%25%50%75%100%
15-19
96% 82%99%
20-24
83% 74%90%
25-29
71% 61%79%
30-34
68% 58%76%
35-39
60% 49%69%
40-44
68% 58%77%
45-49
59% 47%69%
50-54
44% 34%55%
55-59
34% 24%46%
60-64
38% 28%50%
65-69
22% 13%33%
70-74
14% 7%25%
estimate 95% interval everyone

Every breakdown

Full report

The answer by all ninety attributes, ranked by how much they separate people, with an interval on each.

Ask us to run it →

State by state

Full report

The answer in every state, mapped, with the sample behind each.

Ask us to run it →

In the full report

This page is the free preview: the answer, why, and four breakdowns. A full run adds the rest. See what the report holds on this sample, or read a finished report.

The kinds of people in this answer

Full report

Four or five groups of reasons, each with its share and its number: who anchors on today’s bill, who shares a login, who pays for the kids.

Ask us to run it →

Every reason, exportable

Full report

All the people asked, in their own words, with their attributes, as a table to filter and download.

Ask us to run it →

The whole population

Full report

Thousands of profiles instead of a hundred: intervals a fifth as wide, and rare groups large enough to read.

Ask us to run it →

The next questions

Full report

Would you take ads for five dollars less? Which service would you drop first? Asked of the same people.

Ask us to run it →

A one-page summary

Full report

This page says the finding in short; the report lays it out with the chart, the segments and the caveats as one page to print or forward.

Ask us to run it →

How this was computed

Populationadults in Colorado, 4,751,000 peopleQuestion as askedWould you take a job that paid less but offered more flexible hours?
Options: Yes · No · Not sure
Sample1,000 profiles drawn in a fixed representative order from the population; asking more extends the same sample rather than starting overMethodEach profile answers in character from its own attributes. Answers outside the format are discarded before counting.AccuracyThe interval reflects sampling variation in the simulated sample. On 11 yes-or-no questions checked against the 2024 General Social Survey, simulated answers from this population sat a median 17 points from real people's within demographic groups and 8 points nationally. Every check

Run it on the whole population

A full run asks every relevant profile, breaks the answer down by any attribute, and takes your own segments. Tell us what you want to run; we reply within a day.

Get in touch